Reading the structure
Most reports separate confirmed alterations, variants of uncertain significance, signature-level findings and technical quality information.
Report interpretation
What it involves
Most reports separate confirmed alterations, variants of uncertain significance, signature-level findings and technical quality information.
These are findings whose meaning is not yet established. They are not evidence of a treatable target and are not evidence of safety either.
An alteration may be approved-target relevant in one cancer, trial-relevant in another, and of no current treatment relevance in a third.
Some tumour findings raise the possibility of an inherited variant, which is addressed through separate germline testing and genetic counselling.
Low tumour content, degraded samples or incomplete coverage can limit what a report can conclude, which matters when results appear negative.
Depending on the findings, discussion may cover standard treatment, targeted options, trial referral, repeat or additional testing, or tumour board review.
This page explains how reports are interpreted. It does not interpret any individual report, confirm eligibility for treatment or replace review by a treating oncologist.
Bring the full report, pathology, recent imaging and your treatment history to make the review complete.